TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Letts v. Cole

Letts Et Ux., Appellants, v. Cole Et Al.

Letts v. Cole, 165 A. 847 (Pa. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 24, 1933
Docket
Nos. s, 181 and 182
Judges
Frazer, Kephart, Schaffer, Maxey, Drew, Linn
Citations
165 A. 847310 Pa. 5091933 Pa. LEXIS 465

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam, Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued to recover compensation for injuries received by the latter when struck by defendant’s automobile. The accident happened shortly after the noon hour November 2, 1931. Mrs. Letts, alighted from a northbound bus in which she was a passenger, at the corner of Washington Avenue at its intersection with Franklin Street, in the Borough of Jermyn, passed in front of the standing bus to cross to the opposite side of the street, and was hit while crossing the car track, located in the middle of the 30-foot cartway, by defendant’s car traveling in the same direction as the bus from which she alighted. Mrs. Letts testified she looked toward the south, the direction from which defendant’s automobile came, before stepping from the sidewalk after leaving the bus, saw no traffic approaching, and did not again look in that direction before entering on the street car track upon which defendant’s automobile was running, and had almost cleared the track when struck by defendant’s car. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, the trial judge entered a compulsory nonsuit on the ground that the evidence showed Mrs. Letts guilty, as a matter of law, of contributory negligence in failing to look for approaching vehicles, after passing in front of the bus and before committing herself to the street car track. The judgment entered by the court below was properly sustained by the court in banc, under Patton v. George, 284 Pa. 342 ; McAteer v. Highland Coffee Co., 291 Pa. 32 ; Halpert v. Ernshaw, 304 Pa. 95 .

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1933: 11935: 11939: 11942: 11956: 119332026peak 1933 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bryan v. City of Chicago20 N.E.2d 37 (Ill. 1939)
  2. Prill v. City of Chicago46 N.E.2d 119 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
  3. Evelyn H. Tollisen v. Sehigh Valley Transportation Company234 F.2d 121 (3d Cir. 1956)
  4. Taylor v. Philadelphia Rural Transit Co.170 A. 327 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1933)
  5. Reiff v. Boland24 Pa. D. & C. 321 (1935)

Most recent

  1. Evelyn H. Tollisen v. Sehigh Valley Transportation Company234 F.2d 121 (3d Cir. 1956)
  2. Prill v. City of Chicago46 N.E.2d 119 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
  3. Bryan v. City of Chicago20 N.E.2d 37 (Ill. 1939)
  4. Reiff v. Boland24 Pa. D. & C. 321 (1935)
  5. Taylor v. Philadelphia Rural Transit Co.170 A. 327 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Patton v. George, 131 A. 245 (Pa. 1925) 15
McAteer v. Highland Coffee Co., 139 A. 585 (Pa. 1927) 6
Halpert v. Earnshaw, 155 A. 299 (Pa. 1931) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list