TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Tenaglia v. Tenaglia

Tenaglia v. Tenaglia, Appellant

Tenaglia v. Tenaglia, 188 A. 370 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 17, 1936
Docket
Nos. , 83
Judges
Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker, James, Rhodes
Citations
188 A. 370124 Pa. Super. 1241936 Pa. Super. LEXIS 341

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam, Upon a review of the evidence in this case we are in general accord with the conclusions of the Master and the Court below. Since the argument the appellant has died. We shall decide the case—see Upperman v. Upperman, 119 Pa. Superior Ct. 341—but no good purpose would be served by a review of the evidence.

The decree is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1950: 11980: 119502026peak 1950 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mabry v. Baird1950 OK 132, 219 P.2d 234
  2. Shuda v. Shuda423 A.2d 1242 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Shuda v. Shuda423 A.2d 1242 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)
  2. Mabry v. Baird1950 OK 132, 219 P.2d 234

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Upperman v. Upperman, 181 A. 253 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1935) 24

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list