TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hasinger v. N.Y. Cen. Mut. F. Ins. Co.

Hasinger v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Hasinger v. N.Y. Cen. Mut. F. Ins. Co., 178 A. 153 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 21, 1934
Judges
PER CURIAM, April 15, 1935:
Citations
178 A. 153117 Pa. Super. 4751935 Pa. Super. LEXIS 443

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Argued November 21, 1934. Judgment was entered in the court below against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of assumpsit. The action was brought by certain members of St. Bernard's Roman Catholic Church, an unincorporated association, on its behalf, to recover the return or unearned premium due the church on the cancellation of a fire insurance policy covering the church property which had been issued by the defendant insurance company.

The action was not brought to recover a loss under the policy, but for the return or unearned premium payable on its cancellation. It was not necessary to append a copy of the policy to the plaintiff's statement.

The opinion of Judge PATTERSON of the court below clearly and concisely states the facts involved and the law applicable to the case.

The judgment is affirmed on that opinion. *Page 480

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1952: 11955: 11960: 119522026peak 1952 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Commuters' Committee v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission88 A.2d 420 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1952)
  2. Dávila v. Secretario de Estado83 P.R. Dec. 186 (1960)
  3. Textile Workers Union v. Textron, Inc.111 A.2d 823 (N.H. 1955)

Most recent

  1. Dávila v. Secretario de Estado83 P.R. Dec. 186 (1960)
  2. Textile Workers Union v. Textron, Inc.111 A.2d 823 (N.H. 1955)
  3. Commuters' Committee v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission88 A.2d 420 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list