TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Davis v. Industrial Health, Accident & Life Insurance

Davis v. Industrial Health, Accident and Life Insurance Co., Appellant

Davis v. Indus. Health, Accident & Life Ins., 176 A. 58 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 4, 1935
Docket
No. 380
Judges
Trexler, Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker
Citations
176 A. 58115 Pa. Super. 5581935 Pa. Super. LEXIS 358
Cited by 7

Opinion of the Court — Baldrige

Opinion by Baldrige, J., This action was tried with that of Florence Davis v.. The State Mutual Benefit Society. The same facts and legal principles are involved in both cases. We have filed an opinion this day in that case, and for the. reasons therein set forth, judgment of the court below is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 7 cases

View all citing references →
1940: 11942: 11953: 11954: 11958: 11965: 11966: 119402026peak 1940 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. McMillan v. Mor Heat Oil & Equip. Co., Inc.101 A.2d 413 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1953)
  2. Lochhead v. Nierenberg18 A.2d 472 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1940)
  3. Coventry v. Keith106 A.2d 658 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1954)
  4. Williams v. Philadelphia Toilet & Laundry Co.29 A.2d 336 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1942)
  5. Furia v. Perri144 A.2d 502 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1958)
  6. Wynkoop v. McLendon220 A.2d 904 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1966)

Most recent

  1. Wynkoop v. McLendon220 A.2d 904 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1966)
  2. Hitz v. Stouffer215 A.2d 398 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965) · Dissent
  3. Furia v. Perri144 A.2d 502 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1958)
  4. Coventry v. Keith106 A.2d 658 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1954)
  5. McMillan v. Mor Heat Oil & Equip. Co., Inc.101 A.2d 413 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1953)
  6. Williams v. Philadelphia Toilet & Laundry Co.29 A.2d 336 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list