TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Berdan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Berdan, Appellant, v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Berdan v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 33 A.2d 264 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1943)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 3, 1943
Docket
No. 143
Judges
Baldrige, Hirt, Keller, Kenworthey, Reno, Rhodes, Stadtfeld
Citations
33 A.2d 264153 Pa. Super. 491943 Pa. Super. LEXIS 28

Opinion of the Court — Hirt

Opinion by Hirt, J., 'Claimant, after 35 years of service with Carnegie Illinois Steel Corporation as a laborer, became eligible *50 for a pension payable by Ms employer. He retired on July 1,1940 and has not been employed since that date. He made a claim for unemployment compensation but not until January 30, 1942. Under the provisions of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess. P. L. (1937) 2897) the board of review had no alternative and the claim was denied.

As indicated by its name, and the “Declaration of Public Policy” in §3, 43 PS 752, the Act applies to those who normally are employed and who, both able and willing to work, are periodically out of employment through no fault of their own. Except in a limited sense the compensation provided is not unemployment insurance and, though intended to foster economic security and to prevent indigency, the Act is not a general measure in relief of the poor.

Consistent with its. purpose and as a condition precedent to benefits, a claimant under the Act must show earnings from employment during a “base year” made up of “the first four of the last five completed calendar quarters immediately preceding the first day of an individual’s benefit year.” (Italics added.) §4(a), 43 PS 753. And to be eligible for compensation an employee’s total wages during his base year must be “not less than thirteen times his weekly compensation 'amount.” §401 (a), 43 PS 801. The amount of weekly compensation is computed under the Act at one-half “of the employee’s full-time weekly wage.” §403, 43 PS 803. Claimant’s full-time weekly wage prior to retirement was $24.80. Thus, to qualify for compensation, claimant was obliged to show earnings during his base year immediately preceding his application, of thirteen times $12.40, or $161.20.

Claimant earned nothing during that period and no compensation is payable under the Act.

Order affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1947: 119472026peak 1947 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dawkins Unemployment Compensation Case52 A.2d 362 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1947)

Most recent

  1. Dawkins Unemployment Compensation Case52 A.2d 362 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1947)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list