TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Szily v. Szily

Szily, Appellant, v. Szily; Szily v. Szily, Appellant

Szily v. Szily, 13 A.2d 111 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1940)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 10, 1940
Docket
Nos. s, 159 and 160
Judges
PER CURIAM, April 29, 1940:
Citations
13 A.2d 111140 Pa. Super. 651940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 412

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam, We have read the testimony in these cases with care and agree with the learned judge of the court below, who heard the cases, that the husband, who sought a divorce a vinculo matrimonii from his wife is not entitled to a decree; and that the wife, who sought a divorce a mensa et thoro from her husband, is entitled to a decree.

No good purpose will be served by reciting the unsavory details which appear in the record. They support the respective decrees entered by the court below.

No. 159—Decree affirmed at costs of appellant.

No. 160—Decree affirmed at costs of appellant.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list