TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fisher v. Stevens Coal Co.

Fisher v. Stevens Coal Company, Appellant

Fisher v. Stevens Coal Co., 17 A.2d 642 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1940)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 29, 1940
Docket
Nos. , 277
Judges
Baldeige, Cunningham, Hiet, Kellee, Paekee, Rhodes, Stadteeld
Citations
17 A.2d 642143 Pa. Super. 1151941 Pa. Super. LEXIS 18

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam, The judgment in the court below in favor of the plaintiff is fully sustained by the opinion of Judge Cummings discharging defendant’s rule for judgment non obstante veredicto and ordering the prothonotary to enter judgment on the verdict. See Reporter’s Statement.

We may add that the opinion and order of the National Labor Relations Board, filed January 5, 1940, in the matter of Stevens Coal Company and Progressive Mine Workers of America, proceedings Nos. R-1536, R-1537, R-1538, before the National Labor Relations Board, admitted in evidence in the court below as Defendant’s Exhibit 4, “for such consideration as it is entitled to;’ — although in the view of the lower court not strictly relevant to the issue being tried — relating, as they do, to a proceeding or proceedings brought before that Board on April 24, 1939, and hearings had thereon over a gear after the bringing of this action on July 15, 1938, have no relevance or authority in the determination of this case.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1959: 11974: 119592026peak 1959 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Philadelphia Federation of Teachers v. Board of Education327 A.2d 47 (Pa. 1974)
  2. Murtha v. Pet Dairy Products Company314 S.W.2d 185 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1959)

Most recent

  1. Philadelphia Federation of Teachers v. Board of Education327 A.2d 47 (Pa. 1974)
  2. Murtha v. Pet Dairy Products Company314 S.W.2d 185 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1959)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list