TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Baca v. Campbell

Lilyan Baca, Francisca Mariscal, Sharon Robertson, Loron Stowers, Seab Lee, Michael Saldana, by and Through Rosario Saldana, His Mother and Next Friend v. George Campbell, Robert Corbin, Ed Pastor, Henry H. Haws and Hawley Atkinson, Individually and as Members of the Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Arizona Joseph Prekup, Assistant County Manager for Health Services of Maricopa County, Arizona

Baca v. Campbell, 695 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1982)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 20, 1982
Docket
No. 79-3794
Citations
695 F.2d 3521982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23177

Opinion

695 F.2d 352

Lilyan BACA, Francisca Mariscal, Sharon Robertson, Loron Stowers, Seab Lee, Michael Saldana, by and through Rosario Saldana, his mother and next friend; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George CAMPBELL, Robert Corbin, Ed Pastor, Henry H. Haws and Hawley Atkinson, individually and as members of the Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Arizona; Joseph Prekup, Assistant County Manager for Health Services of Maricopa County, Arizona, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 79-3794.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued Aug. 10, 1981. Submitted June 30, 1982. Decided Dec. 20, 1982.

John G. Balentine, Southern Ariz. Legal Aid, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Gordon Goodnow, Jr., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, William P. Copple, Judge.

Before SKELTON, * Senior Judge, KILKENNY and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

1

The matter is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment, 455 U.S. 445 , 102 S.Ct. 1162 , 71 L.Ed.2d 325 (1982). The district court may, if it deems it advisable, conduct further proceedings to supplement the record.

KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, specially concurring:

2

I would hold that the remand should be limited to the precise question of whether the post-judgment motion unfairly surprised or prejudiced the appellees. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment, 455 U.S. 445 , at page ----, 102 S.Ct. 1162 , at pages 1167-1168. In passing on the question, the district court might, if it deems it advisable, conduct further proceedings to supplement the record.

* Honorable Byron G. Skelton, Senior Judge, U.S. Court of Claims, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
White v. N.H. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 455 U.S. 445 (1982) 1,188

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list