Southern Seating & Cabinet Co. v. First National Bank
Southern Seating and Cabinet Co. v. the First National Bank.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Woods.
On March 9, 1907, Bishop H. P. Northrop sent to the plaintiffs a check for five hundred dollars on The First National Bank of Charleston, S. C. This check has never been presented for payment. The plaintiffs having written! Bishop Northrop asking payment of the balance of a debt which the check was intended to pay, Bishop Northrop sent another check written in these words:
“Charleston, S. C., 8th April, 1907. No. The First National Bank — of Charleston, S. C. Pay to the order of the Southern Seating and Cabinet Company, $500, five *81 hundred 00-100 dollars if previous check for $500, dated March 9th, is still- unpaid. H. P. Northrop.”
payment having been refused when Bishop Northrop had to his credit on his deposit account over five thousand dollars, the plaintiffs sued the bank thereon. The Circuit Court sustained the bank’s defense that it could not be required to pay the second check when it had notice by the writing on the check that the original -check covering 'the same -debt was outstanding. The case does not call for a discussion of the rights of the bank and the depositor and the payee when ordinary original and duplicate checks are given; for the depositor on the face of the check gave explicit directions as to the application of 'his funds which the bank was bound to follow. Having abundant funds to pay both checks, he directed the bank in language which could not be made plainer to pay to plaintiffs the sum of five hundred dollars and charge it to deposit account, unless the bank had already paid another check for a like amount dated March 9th, in favor of the same payee. As the bank had not paid such other check, check, under the law of South Carolina, became on presentation an assignment pro tanto of the deposit account, the bank became liable to the payee for the amount of check.
Loan and Savings Bank v. Farmers and Merchants Bank, 74 S. C., 210, 54 S. E., 364 .
depositor Bishop Northrop, by the express direction to pay second check if the first had not been paid, chose to assume all risks as to the first check given by him, including risk that it might be necessary for the bank’s protection it should hold five hundred dollars of his funds to meet first check in case it should be presented by a bona ñde indorsee for value.
is reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.