Senterfeit v. Shealy
Senterfeit v. Shealy.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by *385 Mr. Justice Gary.
This is an appeal from an order susr taining a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in that it was “necessary not only to allege ownership, but the right of the plaintiff to immediate possession, in order to make out a complete statement of cause of action.”
The first paragraph of the complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner in fee of the land therein described.
The second paragraph of the complaint is as follows:
“2.
That the defendants, Amanda Shealy, Jane Shealy and R. B. Shealy, are in the wrongful and unlawful possession of said tract of land, and have refused to surrender possession of same to plaintiffs after demand made, and that by reason of the .wrongful and unlawful withholding of the possession of said tract of land by the defendants from the plaintiffs, the said plaintiffs have been damaged by the said defendants in the sum of one hundred dollars.” It is only necessary to cite the recent case of Livingston v. Ruff, 65 S. C., 284, to show that the order was erroneous.
The judgment of this Court is, that the order of the Circuit Court be reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.