TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Moore v. Hinson

Moore v. Hinson.

Moore v. Hinson, 92 S.E. 619 (S.C. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 29, 1917
Docket
No. 9691
Judges
Gary
Citations
92 S.E. 619107 S.C. 2901917 S.C. LEXIS 105
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Syllabus
Appeal and Error — Discontinuance of Appeal. — Where a case was settled by appellant without knowledge of his attorney, the appeal was discontinued.
Summary
Before Mauedin, J., Cheraw, Action by D. F. Moore against G. W. Hinson. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Gary

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

When this case was called for argument, the respondent’s attorney announced that his information was by a telegram from his office at Cheraw that the case was settled. Appellant’s attorney said he had no information concerning the alleged settlement, and argued the case. Investigation develops the fact that the case was settled between the par *291 ties, money paid to the clerk of Court of Chesterfield county by the respondent, and received by the appellant.

It is, therefore, ordered that this action on the part of the appellant worked a discontinuance of -the appeal, and the Court will not consider the appeal.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1951: 11970: 119512026peak 1951 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Berry v. ZAHLER ET UX.66 S.E.2d 459 (S.C. 1951)
  2. South Carolina State Highway Department v. McKeown Food Store No. 9174 S.E.2d 342 (S.C. 1970)

Most recent

  1. South Carolina State Highway Department v. McKeown Food Store No. 9174 S.E.2d 342 (S.C. 1970)
  2. Berry v. ZAHLER ET UX.66 S.E.2d 459 (S.C. 1951)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list