TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Derrick v. City of Columbia

Derrick v. City of Columbia.

Derrick v. City of Columbia, 114 S.E. 857 (S.C. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 16, 1922
Docket
No. 11064
Judges
Gary
Citations
114 S.E. 857114 S.E. 837122 S.C. 291922 S.C. LEXIS 233

Opinion of the Court — Gary

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Ci-iiee Justice Gary.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint, the demurrer, the order overruling the demurrer, and the exceptions will be reported.

Section 2939 of the Civil Code of Daws 1912, is as follows :

“Establishment of Slaughter Pens:

— Municipal corporations in this State containing five thousand inhabitants or more, may establish, or permit, or require the establishment of slaughter pens without and beyond their corporate limits, and may prescribe regulations for the establishment, maintenance and conduct of the same, and shall have the right to enforce all such regulations as if the same were estab *35 lished and conducted within the corporate limits. The police jurisdiction of any municipality that may establish, or permit the establishment of, a slaughter pen, or slaughter pens, shall extend to and cover the same, and all land and property necessarily used in connection therewith, not exceeding five acres, for the purpose of protecting and preserving the health in the inspection and slaughtering of animals for food, and in the protection and use of any such slaughter pen and grounds and- of the property therein or thereon, and in the transportation of meats from pens to such city, and in preserving peace and order at said pens and on said grounds.”

The allegations of the complaint that “the cause of such emission of offensive odors and gases from the said slaughterhouse is due to the construction of the plant, in that no adequate provision is made to prevent the noxious odors corrupting the atmosphere,” in effect charge negligence on the part of the defendant.

Conceding that the defendant had the authority, under Section 2939 of the Code of Taws 1912, to construct and maintain the plant, it was liable for such damages as were proximately caused by the negligent operation of the plant.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1924: 11926: 11927: 11929: 11931: 21932: 11933: 11940: 11958: 11967: 119242026peak 1931 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway Department157 S.E. 842 (S.C. 1931)
  2. Caldwell v. Carroll137 S.E. 444 (S.C. 1927)
  3. Taylor v. Lexington Water Power Co.163 S.E. 137 (S.C. 1932)
  4. Gasque v. Town of Conway8 S.E.2d 871 (S.C. 1940)
  5. Sherbert v. School Dist. 85, Spartanburg Co.168 S.E. 391 (S.C. 1933)
  6. Collins v. CITY OF GREENVILLE, SC105 S.E.2d 704 (S.C. 1958)

Most recent

  1. Kline v. City of Columbia155 S.E.2d 597 (S.C. 1967)
  2. Collins v. CITY OF GREENVILLE, SC105 S.E.2d 704 (S.C. 1958)
  3. Gasque v. Town of Conway8 S.E.2d 871 (S.C. 1940)
  4. Sherbert v. School Dist. 85, Spartanburg Co.168 S.E. 391 (S.C. 1933)
  5. Taylor v. Lexington Water Power Co.163 S.E. 137 (S.C. 1932)
  6. Chewning v. Clarendon County161 S.E. 777 (S.C. 1931) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list