TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

South Carolina Cotton Growers' Cooperative Ass'n v. English

South Carolina Cotton Growers' Cooperative Association v. English.

S.C. Cotton Growers' Coop. Ass'n v. English, 133 S.E. 542 (S.C. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 31, 1926
Docket
No. 12002
Judges
Beease, Ci-Iiee, Gary, Messrs, Watts, Cothran, Stabéer
Citations
133 S.E. 542135 S.C. 191926 S.C. LEXIS 84

Opinion of the Court — Beease

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Beease.

In this cause, the decree of his Honor, Circuit Judge M. R. Bonham (which will be reported), seems to' us to be in full accord with the'law, equity, and justice, and the same is affirmed in all respects.

Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Gary and Messrs. Justices Watts, Cothran and StabéER concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1936: 11939: 11945: 11951: 11980: 22005: 12019: 119362026peak 1980 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.307 U.S. 533 (1939)
  2. In re Wiring Device Antitrust Litigation498 F. Supp. 79 (E.D.N.Y. 1980)
  3. In re Dealer Management Systems Antitrust Litigation362 F. Supp. 3d 510 (E.D. Ill. 2019)
  4. In re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litigation401 F. Supp. 2d 461 (D. Maryland 2005)
  5. Robinette Hardware Co. v. Square D Co.498 F. Supp. 79 (E.D.N.Y. 1980)
  6. Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.65 S.E.2d 781 (S.C. 1951)

Most recent

  1. In re Dealer Management Systems Antitrust Litigation362 F. Supp. 3d 510 (E.D. Ill. 2019)
  2. In re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litigation401 F. Supp. 2d 461 (D. Maryland 2005)
  3. In re Wiring Device Antitrust Litigation498 F. Supp. 79 (E.D.N.Y. 1980)
  4. Robinette Hardware Co. v. Square D Co.498 F. Supp. 79 (E.D.N.Y. 1980)
  5. Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.65 S.E.2d 781 (S.C. 1951)
  6. Robbins v. Dinkins35 S.E.2d 697 (S.C. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list