TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Flood v. Evening Post Publishing Co.

Flood v. Evening Post Publ'g Co., 50 S.E. 641 (S.C. 1905)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1905
Judges
Pope, Messrs, Gary, Jones, Woods
Citations
50 S.E. 64171 S.C. 1221905 S.C. LEXIS 15
Disposition
Reversed.
Syllabus
Ruled by preceding case of Flood v. News and Courier Co.
Summary
Before- DantzeER, J., Charleston, Action by Augustus M. Flood against Evening Post Publishing Co. From Circuit order sustaining demurrer, plaintiff ap-peals. (Same citations as in case of Wood against News and Courier Co.) cites: It is not libellous per se io apply to a white mam, the term “colored” or negro:” 1 McC., 52; 18 Ency., 2 ed., 916, 917, note; 1 McM., 16; 28 Am. R., 580; 29 Fed. R., 828; 1 N. & McC., 349; 28 N. E. R., 692; 17 N. Y., 493; 4 So. R., 71; 28 So-. R., 91; 53 N. C., 184; 4 Cranch, 235; 1 Dow-1., 672; 1 McC., 203; Code 1902, 2158, 2821; Crim. Code, 293; 95 Am. Dec., 521.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Pope

The op-inion o-f the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Pope.

This case presents the precise question disposed of in the case of Augustus Flood v. The News and Courier Company, where the order sustaining the demurrer was reversed. Having overruled the demurrer in that case, it only remains for us, upon the authority of that case, to reverse the order sustaining the demurrer in this case.

*123 The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, where it sustained the demurrer in this case, and the action is remanded to the Circuit Court for such other proceeding's as may be in accordance with law.

Messrs. Justices Gary, Jones and Woods concur in the result, as the complaint alleges that the publication zvas zvilful and malicious.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1913: 11954: 11957: 119132026peak 1913 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Black v. State Co.77 S.E. 51 (S.C. 1913)
  2. Natchez Times Publishing Co. v. Dunigan72 So. 2d 681 (Miss. 1954)
  3. Bowen v. Independent Publishing Co.96 S.E.2d 564 (S.C. 1957)

Most recent

  1. Bowen v. Independent Publishing Co.96 S.E.2d 564 (S.C. 1957)
  2. Natchez Times Publishing Co. v. Dunigan72 So. 2d 681 (Miss. 1954)
  3. Black v. State Co.77 S.E. 51 (S.C. 1913)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list