TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Barker v. Thomas

Barker v. Thomas.

Barker v. Thomas, 67 S.E. 1 (S.C. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 1, 1910
Docket
No. 7460
Judges
Jones
Citations
67 S.E. 185 S.C. 821910 S.C. LEXIS 194
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
1. Nossuit. — As appeal from order refusing nonsuit is not allowed until final judgment is rendered. 2. New Trial. — As appeal from an order granting a new trial in an action for possession of land on ground that verdict is inconsistent with the evidence will not be entertained, because in such case judgment absolute cannot be rendered by this Court.
Summary
Before MemmingER, J., Berkeley, April term, 1908. Action by Theodore G. Barker and Henry L. Barker against Harvey C. Thomas and M. M. Haynes. Defendants appeal from order refusing nonsuit and granting new trial.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Jones

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. ChiEE Justice Jones.

This is an action for the recovery of real estate and was tried before Judge Memminger and a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, motion for nonsuit was made and refused. Defendants offering no testimony, the case was submitted to the jury upon the testimony offered by plaintiffs. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendants, which Judge Memminger set aside of his own motion on the ground that it was inconsistent with the testimony. Defendants appeal upon exceptions to the refusal of nonsuit and the granting of a new trial.

1

An appeal from an order refusing nonsuit is not allowed before final judgment is rendered.

Agnew v. Adams, 24 S. C., 86.

2

An appeal from an order granting a new trial will not be entertained except in a case in which judgment absolute might be rendered by this Court.

Lampley v. Atlantic, 11 S. C., 319, 57 S. E., 1104 ;

Jones v. Woodside Cotton Mills, 83 S. C., 565 and other cases cited therein.

This is not a case in which judgment absolute may be rendered.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11911: 11912: 21916: 11923: 11925: 11941: 11948: 119102026peak 1912 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Parham-Thomas-McSwain, Inc. v. Atlantic Life Insurance90 S.E. 1022 (S.C. 1916)
  2. Keels v. Powell50 S.E.2d 704 (S.C. 1948)
  3. Floyd v. Page117 S.E. 409 (S.C. 1923)
  4. Snipes v. Davis, Director General127 S.E. 447 (S.C. 1925)
  5. Hayes v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.13 S.E.2d 921 (S.C. 1941)
  6. Bowen v. Johnson69 S.E. 294 (S.C. 1910)

Most recent

  1. Keels v. Powell50 S.E.2d 704 (S.C. 1948)
  2. Hayes v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.13 S.E.2d 921 (S.C. 1941)
  3. Snipes v. Davis, Director General127 S.E. 447 (S.C. 1925)
  4. Floyd v. Page117 S.E. 409 (S.C. 1923)
  5. Parham-Thomas-McSwain, Inc. v. Atlantic Life Insurance90 S.E. 1022 (S.C. 1916)
  6. McKnight v. Dyson74 S.E. 753 (S.C. 1912)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Lampley v. Atl. Coast Line R. R., 57 S.E. 1104 (S.C. 1907) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list