TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Crook v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Crook v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. Et Al.

Crook v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 178 S.E. 254 (S.C. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 9, 1935
Docket
No. 13968
Judges
Ramage
Citations
178 S.E. 254175 S.C. 421935 S.C. LEXIS 66

Opinion of the Court — Ramage

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. C. J: Ramage, Acting Associate Justice.

The decree of his Honor, Circuit Judge Oxner, is satisfactory to the Court and is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court. The decree which will be reported is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 22 cases

View all citing references →
1941: 11942: 11945: 11958: 11962: 21969: 21972: 11973: 11977: 11980: 11985: 11987: 31992: 11993: 11997: 12005: 12007: 12026: 119412026peak 1987 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hovis v. New Hampshire Insurance (In re Larymore)82 B.R. 409 (E.D.S.C. 1987)
  2. Russell v. Williams374 P.2d 827 (Cal. 1962)
  3. Burns v. California Fair Plan Ass'n61 Cal. Rptr. 3d 809 (2007)
  4. Keesecker v. Bird490 S.E.2d 754 (W. Va. 1997)
  5. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Republic National Bank of Dallas480 S.W.2d 762 (Tex. App. 1972)
  6. Kirchner v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.440 S.W.2d 751 (Mo. Ct. App. 1969)

Most recent

  1. Moenay Womack, individually and as Guardian ad Litem of M.J., T.J., and J.J., minors v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company; Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Jamaris JordanNo. 4:25-cv-02749 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2026)
  2. Burns v. California Fair Plan Ass'n61 Cal. Rptr. 3d 809 (2007)
  3. Browning v. Browning621 S.E.2d 389 (S.C. Ct. App. 2005)
  4. Keesecker v. Bird490 S.E.2d 754 (W. Va. 1997)
  5. Benton & Rhodes, Inc. v. Boden426 S.E.2d 823 (S.C. Ct. App. 1993)
  6. Parker v. Byrd420 S.E.2d 850 (S.C. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list