TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Trotter v. Merchants & Farmers Bank

Trotter v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 186 S.E. 371 (S.C. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 11, 1936
Docket
No. 14311
Judges
Fishburne, Stabler, Messrs, Carter, Bonham, Baker
Citations
186 S.E. 371180 S.C. 4491936 S.C. LEXIS 139105 A.L.R. 1512

Opinion of the Court — Fishburne

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Fishburne.

This action was brought by T. K. Trotter, Receiver of the Bank of Bethune, against Merchants & Farmers Bank of Bethune, to recover the sum of $4,445.53, which amount had been previously paid to the defendant bank by the former Receiver of the Bank of Bethune as a preferential claim.

The cause was referred to the Master for Kershaw County, who found all issues of law and fact against the defendant. Upon exceptions being taken to the Circuit Court, the Referee’s report was confirmed in its entirety. The appeal to this Court involves and comprehends *459 the same issues which were before the Master and the Circuit Court, except that it, for the first time, brings into the case the question as to whether the transaction in litigation constituted a trust ex maleficio.

As this issue was not presented to nor passed upon by the Circuit Court, it may not be considered here.

Upon a careful consideration of the record and the issues made by the exceptions, this Court is satisfied with the findings of fact and conclusions of law reached by the Master and confirmed by the Circuit Court. As additional support to the Circuit decree, we cite the case of South Carolina State Bank v. Citizens’

Bank, 173 S. C., 496, 176 S. E., 346 , 95 A. L. R., 667, where similar and applicable principles of law are discussed.

Let the report of the Master, commencing at “Findings of Fact,” be reported, together with the decree of the Circuit Court.

All exceptions are overruled.

It is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Carter, Bonham and Baker concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1938: 11947: 11955: 219382026peak 1955 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. State of Sc87 S.E.2d 577 (S.C. 1955)
  2. Northwestern Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. E. Henry Wemme Endowment Fund80 P.2d 881 (Or. 1938)
  3. United States v. State87 S.E.2d 577 (S.C. 1955)
  4. Oeland v. Kimbrell's Furniture Co., Inc.42 S.E.2d 228 (S.C. 1947)

Most recent

  1. United States v. State of Sc87 S.E.2d 577 (S.C. 1955)
  2. United States v. State87 S.E.2d 577 (S.C. 1955)
  3. Oeland v. Kimbrell's Furniture Co., Inc.42 S.E.2d 228 (S.C. 1947)
  4. Northwestern Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. E. Henry Wemme Endowment Fund80 P.2d 881 (Or. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
S.C. State Bank v. Citizens' Bank, 176 S.E. 346 (S.C. 1934) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list