TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jewel Tea Co., Inc. v. City of Camden

Jewel Tea Co., Inc. v. City of Camden.

Jewel Tea Co. v. City of Camden, 172 S.E. 307 (S.C. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 9, 1934
Docket
No. 13748
Judges
Stabrer, Brease, Messrs, Carter, Bonham
Citations
172 S.E. 307171 S.C. 3531934 S.C. LEXIS 6

Opinion of the Court — Stabrer

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Stabrer.

For the reasons stated by his Honor, Judge Dennis, in his decree, which will be reported, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Brease and Messrs. Justices Carter and Bonham concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1939: 11945: 11962: 119392026peak 1939 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Joseph M. Shealy, Jr. v. Challenger Manufacturing Company, Inc.304 F.2d 102 (4th Cir. 1962)
  2. City of Waseca v. Braun288 N.W. 229 (Minn. 1939)
  3. State v. Appley35 S.E.2d 835 (S.C. 1945)

Most recent

  1. Joseph M. Shealy, Jr. v. Challenger Manufacturing Company, Inc.304 F.2d 102 (4th Cir. 1962)
  2. State v. Appley35 S.E.2d 835 (S.C. 1945)
  3. City of Waseca v. Braun288 N.W. 229 (Minn. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list