TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

City of Spartanburg v. Leonard

City of Spartanburg v. Leonard.

City of Spartanburg v. Leonard, 186 S.E. 395 (S.C. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 10, 1936
Docket
No. 14310
Judges
Chiee, Stabler, Messrs, Carter, Bonham, Baker, Fishburne
Citations
186 S.E. 395180 S.C. 4911936 S.C. LEXIS 145

Opinion of the Court — Stabler

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabler.

We have given careful consideration to the questions presented by the appeal in this case, and are satisfied with the conclusions reached and expressed by the Circuit Judge. Plis well-considered decree, therefore, which will be reported, is affirmed and adopted as the judgment of this Court.

Messrs. Justices Carter, Bonham, Baker and Fishburne concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 19 cases

View all citing references →
1936: 11937: 21939: 21940: 11942: 11943: 11944: 11947: 11948: 11950: 11954: 11970: 11976: 11994: 21998: 12015: 119362026peak 1937 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Craig v. Bell46 S.E.2d 52 (S.C. 1948)
  2. State v. Thrift440 S.E.2d 341 (S.C. 1994)
  3. Lewis v. Gaddy173 S.E.2d 376 (S.C. 1970)
  4. Mitchell v. City of Greenville770 S.E.2d 391 (S.C. 2015)
  5. State v. Alls500 S.E.2d 781 (S.C. 1998)
  6. Trustees of Grace Reformed Episcopal Church v. Charleston Insurance868 F. Supp. 128 (D.S.C. 1994)

Most recent

  1. Mitchell v. City of Greenville770 S.E.2d 391 (S.C. 2015)
  2. State v. Alls500 S.E.2d 781 (S.C. 1998)
  3. Trustees of Grace Reformed Episcopal Church v. Charleston Insurance868 F. Supp. 128 (D.S.C. 1994)
  4. State v. Thrift440 S.E.2d 341 (S.C. 1994)
  5. Faile v. South Carolina Employment Security Commission230 S.E.2d 219 (S.C. 1976)
  6. Lewis v. Gaddy173 S.E.2d 376 (S.C. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list