Ocean-Forest Co. v. Woodside
Ocean-Forest Co. v. Woodside Et Al.
Opinion of the Court
*448 The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Carter.
This action by Ocean-Forest Company, a corporation, as plaintiff, against the defendants, John T. Woodside, First National Bank of Columbia, S. C., and Mortgage Loan & Securities Company, a corporation, was commenced in the Court of Common Pleas for Greenville County, and the case comes before this Court on appeal by the defendants from the decree and order issued by his Honor, Judge G. Duncan Bellinger.
The agreed statement of counsel is as follows :
“This action was commenced on the 11th day of August, 1936, by the service of summons and complaint, together with order of Hon. G. Dewey Oxner, Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, requiring the defendants, John T. Woodside and the Mortgage Loan & Securities Company, to show cause why they should not be permanently restrained and enjoined from disposing of certain funds described in the complaint and why said funds should not be declared to be the property of plaintiff. The defendants filed a return and, after hearing the matter, the Court enjoined said defendants from disposing of the checks and funds described in the complaint pendente lite.
Thereafter, the defendants, John T. Woodside and the Mortgage Loan & Securities Company, and the First National Bank of Columbia, S. C., filed their answers to the complaint. The defendants, John T. Woodside and the Mortgage Loan & Securities Company, served notice of motion to submit all issues of fact raised by the pleadings to a jury for determination and also served notice of motion to make the State Highway Department of South Carolina a party-defendant. The plaintiff then served notice of motion to dismiss the answer of the defendants, John T. Woodside and the Mortgage Loan & Securities Company, upon the grounds set forth in the notice. The plaintiff also gave notice of certain affidavits to be used upon defendants’ motion to submit the *449 issues of fact to a jury for determination. All of the motions pending were heard by Judge G. Duncan Bellinger, presiding Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, at the September, 1936, term of the Court of Common Pleas, marked heard, and he thereafter, on October 17, 1936, filed his decree, hereinbefore set forth, giving judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Within due time, the defendants, John T. Woodside and the Mortgage Loan & Securities Company, gave notice of intention to appeal to the Supreme Court of South Carolina from the judgment and decree of his Honor, Judge G. Duncan Bellinger, upon exceptions hereinafter set forth. The defendant, First National Bank of Columbia, S. C., has no material interest in this appeal since, under its answer, it only asked that it be pérmitted to pay the funds involved over to the party entitled thereto.”
Upon due consideration of the record in the case we are satisfied that his Honor, Judge G. Duncan Bellinger, reached the proper conclusion in the case. The exceptions are therefore overruled, and the judgment and decree of the lower Court affirmd.
Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabrer and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Fisi-iburns concur.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(an agent hired to collect a single debt who diverted the money to his own use was guilty of disloyalty to the principal; therefore, he was not entitled to his commission)
-
(mentioning apportionment principle, which was not applicable in that case)
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.