City of Sioux Falls v. Jager
CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, Respondent, v. JAGER, Appellant
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
An information was filed charging the defendant with the sale of liquor on a certain day in March, 1943. The respondent has filed in this court a written confession of error in which there are certain recitals of questions asked relating to prior prosecutions.
An examination of the record indicates that there is prejudicial error and that the judgment cannot be sustained. State v. Dansky, 69 S. D. 311, 9 N. W.2d 752 .
The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.
All the Judges concur, except SMITH, J., absent and not sitting.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.