Sonya Jason v. Jane Fonda
Sonya JASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jane FONDA, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Sonya Jason brought an action against Jane Fonda and eight other defendants for copyright infringement, unfair competition, misappropriation, and breach of implied contract. Mrs. Jason’s primary allegation was that the defendants’ motion picture, Coming Home, infringed on the copyright in her novel, Concomitant Soldier — Woman and War. The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the other claims. We affirm.
*967 Our review of the facts and issues leads us to concur in the well-reasoned decision of Judge Kelleher filed September 21, 1981. 526 F.Supp. 774 (C.D.Cal.1982). We therefore incorporate his memorandum of decision by reference. Judge Kelleher aptly points out:
(1) Mrs. Jason presented evidence showing no more than a “bare possibility” the defendants had access to her work. Such a showing is insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact.
See British Airways Board v. Boeing Company, 585 F.2d 946, 952 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 981 [ 99 S.Ct. 1790 , 60 L.Ed.2d 241 ] (1979);
(2) Even assuming access, there was no substantial similarity between the two works under the standards announced by this court in Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. v. McDonald’s Corp., 562 F.2d 1157 (9th Cir.1977); and (3) It is proper to dismiss pendent state claims when the federal claim is dismissed prior to trial.
Wham-O Mfg. Co. v. Paradise Manufacturing Co., 327 F.2d 748, 753 (9th Cir.1964);
see also, Wren v. Sletten Construction Co., 654 F.2d 529, 536 (9th Cir.1981).
Additionally, Judge Kelleher did not abuse his discretion in handling discovery nor in denying Mrs. Jason’s motion for reconsideration.
The appellees’ request for sanctions and attorney’s fees is denied. Single costs are allowed.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding book sales of approximately 2,000 copies did not create more than a bare possibility of access)
-
(deciding there was no substantial similarity as a matter of law by comparing screenplay and film without reference to expert testimony)
Cited by 46 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Litchfield v. Spielberg
- Overman v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
- Olson v. Tenney
- John William See v. Christopher Durang and L.A. Stage Company
- Lou Shaw Eastborne Productions, Inc. v. Richard Lindheim Michael Sloan Universal City Studios, Inc. Columbia Broadcasting Systems McA Television, Ltd.
- Ted Berkic v. Michael Crichton, Robin Cook, Marvin Moss, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/united Artists Entertainment Company
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.