TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

G.H. S.A. Ry. Co. v. Cade

Galveston, Harrisburg San Antonio Railway Company v. James B. Cade.

G.H. S.A. Ry. Co. v. Cade, 94 S.W. 219 (Tex. 1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 23, 1906
Docket
No. Application No. 5002.
Judges
BROWN, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE.
Citations
94 S.W. 219100 Tex. 371906 Tex. LEXIS 168

Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Court of Civil Appeals held that the right to repudiate the settlement made in this case by the plaintiff below with the railroad company was not lost by the delay which had occurred, and that delay to signify a repudiation of that settlement for any period of time short of the time prescribed for limitation of the action would not defeat the right to set the settlement aside. We do not indorse the proposition thus stated, but the reasonableness of the delay being one of fact, this court can not pass upon it, for which reason we refuse the application.

Writ of error refused. *Page 38

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1914: 11915: 11918: 21919: 11925: 11926: 11935: 11937: 21941: 11943: 119142026peak 1918 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Luckenbach v. Thomas166 S.W. 99 (Tex. App. 1914)
  2. Robert Hind, Limited v. Silva75 F.2d 74 (9th Cir. 1935)
  3. Grundy v. Greene207 S.W. 964 (Tex. App. 1918)
  4. Chandler v. Riley210 S.W. 716 (Tex. App. 1919)
  5. Shields v. Dunlap174 S.W.2d 642 (Tex. App. 1943)
  6. Dickson v. Day275 S.W. 307 (Tex. App. 1925)

Most recent

  1. Shields v. Dunlap174 S.W.2d 642 (Tex. App. 1943)
  2. Fort Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Pickens153 S.W.2d 252 (Tex. App. 1941)
  3. Southern Home Bldg. Co. v. Wimbish112 S.W.2d 211 (Tex. App. 1937)
  4. Ley v. Ruland123 S.W.2d 390 (Tex. App. 1937)
  5. Robert Hind, Limited v. Silva75 F.2d 74 (9th Cir. 1935)
  6. Dallas Opera House Ass'n v. Dallas Enterprises, Inc.288 S.W. 656 (Tex. App. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list