Busey v. State
Tom Busey v. the State
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
*24 LATTIMORE, Judge.
Appellant was convicted in the County Court at Law No. One of Harris County, under a complaint and information, charging him in the regular form, with theft of ten bushels of pears, and his punishment was fixed at a fine of ten dollars. The case was tried before the court without the intervention of a jury.
Our law does not authorize punishment by fine alone for misdemeanor theft, and the case will have to be reversed for the illegal punishment. See Art. 1341, Vernon’s Penal Code.
Inasmuch as the case must be sent back to the court a quo, we call attention to Article 1234, of Vernon’s Penal Code, which makes punishable the taking or carrying away of fruit from the orchard of another, and under which article this prosecution must be had; the facts and testimony in the instant case showing that appellant gathered from the orchard of prosecuting witness, the pears in question.
For the error mentioned, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.