O. K. Krause & Co. v. Marx
O. K. Krause & Co. v. M. Marx Et Al.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
FINLEY, Associate Justice.
This is a companion case with the Otto Heinze & Co. and Manhattan Cloak and Suit Company cases, this day decided.
There is but one material difference in the facts of this case from the others named; but that difference is of such gravity as demands a different disposition of the case. In this case appellants brought suit in Lamar County on their entire account against Munzesheimer & Klein, except $180 worth of goods, which were stopped in transitu, without either giving credit or deducting the items of goods taken back in the claim suit, *398 and recovered judgment for the full amount sued for. This judgment had been fully satisfied at the time of the trial of this cause, and thereby appellants’ right to the property in question had been released and extinguished.
Delivered October 25, 1893.
The judgment of the lower court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.
This case did not reach the Reporter with the other October cases.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.