TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

J. S. Brown Hardware Co. v. Indiana Stove Works

J.S. Brown Hardware Company v. Indiana Stove Works.

J. S. Brown Hardware Co. v. Ind. Stove Works, 73 S.W. 800 (Tex. 1903)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 23, 1903
Docket
No. 1168.
Judges
Gaines
Citations
73 S.W. 80096 Tex. 4531903 Tex. LEXIS 158
Headnotes
1. —Inducing Party to Break Contract Actionable. To induce a party to a contract to break it, to the damage of the other party thereto, is an actionable wrong. Raymond v. Yarrington, ante, followed. (P. 457.) 2. —Same—Facts. A mercantile firm which induces a traveling salesman employed to sell goods exclusively for another firm in a similar business to engage secretly in selling its goods also, is liable to an action for the resulting damages. (Pp. 456, 457.)
Summary
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Galveston. The Brown Hardware Company sued the Indiana Stove Works, and defendant had judgment on demurrer, which was affirmed on plaintiff’s appeal. Appellant then obtained writ of error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Gaines

GAINES, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by the J. S. Brown Hardware Company against the Indiana Stove Works. The petition alleged, in substance, that the plaintiff is a corporation chartered under the laws of Texas, and that it is and has been engaged for many years in the business of selling stoves, stove fixtures and attachments, and other hardware by wholesale throughout the State; that it had employed one Hash as a traveling salesman to sell its wares and that Hash had agreed to serve it exclusively; that while he was so engaged, the defendant, the Indiana Stove Works, also a corporation and *457 engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling stoves and stove attachments, and knowing Nash’s contract with the plaintiff, induced him to enter its service, and that the said Nash, while under contract with plaintiff and engaged in its employment, did, without plaintiff’s knowledge, engage in the" sale of the defendant’s products and so continued for the term of five years. The plaintiff further alleges in effect that by reason of the conduct of the defendant it lost trade and was damaged many thousand dollars.

A demurrer to the1 petition was sustained, and on appeal the judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals.

In the case of Raymond v. Yarrington, this day decided, we have held, that to induce a party to a contract to break it to the damage of the other party thereto is an actionable wrong. That ruling is decisive of the question in the present case. It was in our opinion error to sustain the demurrer to the petition.

The judgment of the "District Court and that of the Court of Civil Appeals are therefore reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →
1907: 11911: 11914: 11919: 21927: 11934: 11935: 11936: 11939: 11940: 11941: 11958: 11972: 11976: 11994: 119072026peak 1919 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Reyna865 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. 1994)
  2. Tidal Western Oil Corp. v. Shackelford297 S.W. 279 (Tex. App. 1927)
  3. Carpenters & Joiners Union, Local No. 213 v. Ritter's Cafe149 S.W.2d 694 (Tex. App. 1941)
  4. Grundmeyer v. McFadin537 S.W.2d 764 (Tex. App. 1976)
  5. Bowen v. Speer166 S.W. 1183 (Tex. App. 1914)
  6. Carpenters & Joiners Union, Local No. 213 v. Ritter's Cafe138 S.W.2d 223 (Tex. App. 1940)

Most recent

  1. Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Reyna865 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. 1994)
  2. Grundmeyer v. McFadin537 S.W.2d 764 (Tex. App. 1976)
  3. Yost v. Justin Belt Co.488 S.W.2d 850 (Tex. App. 1972)
  4. Shaw v. Nachman316 S.W.2d 163 (Tex. App. 1958)
  5. Carpenters & Joiners Union, Local No. 213 v. Ritter's Cafe149 S.W.2d 694 (Tex. App. 1941)
  6. Carpenters & Joiners Union, Local No. 213 v. Ritter's Cafe138 S.W.2d 223 (Tex. App. 1940)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list