TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Arrisman v. State

Will Arrisman v. the State

Arrisman v. State, 161 S.W. 118 (Tex. Crim. App. 1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 19, 1913
Docket
No. 2768.
Judges
Prendergast
Citations
161 S.W. 11872 Tex. Crim. 451913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 564
Headnotes
Robbery—Statement of Facts. Where the purported statement of facts was not filed in the court below until six months after the adjournment of the court, the same can not be considered on appeal. [Rehearing denied December 10, 1913.—Reporter.] On question of statement of facts: Johnson v. State, 159 S. W. Rep., 848.
Summary
The opinion states the case.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Prendergast

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery and his punishment fixed at the lowest prescribed by law. What purports to be a very short statement of facts in the case was not filed in the court below until six months after the adjournment of the court, and, of course, can not be considered on this appeal and is struck out on the motion of the Assistant Attorney-General.

There is nothing attempted to be raised by appellant which we can consider in the absence of a statement of facts. The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list