TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gregory v. Houston Oil Co. of Texas

GREGORY Et Al. v. HOUSTON OIL CO. OF TEXAS

Gregory v. Houston Oil Co. of Tex., 154 S.W. 236 (Tex. App. 1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Texas · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 16, 1913
Judges
McMeans
Citations
154 S.W. 2361913 Tex. App. LEXIS 226
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Headnotes
Appeal and Error (§ 100*) — Decisions Reviewable — Refusal to Dissolve Temporary Injunction. While Rev.' Civ. St. 1911, art. 4644, expressly authorizes appeals from orders or judgments granting, refusing, or dissolving temporary injunctions, no appeal lies from an order refusing to dissolve such an injunction. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 670-680; Dec. Dig. § 100.*]
Summary
Appeal from District Court,'Hardin County ; L. B. Hightower, Judge. Action between J. S. Gregory and others and the Houston Oil Company of Texas. From an order refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction, J. S. Gregory and others appeal. •

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — McMEANS

McMEANS, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district judge of the Ninth judicial district, in chambers, refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction theretofore granted by him. Our statutes allow appeals from orders or judgments granting, refusing, or dissolving temporary injunctions. Revised Statutes 1911, art. 4644. No provision is made for an appeal from an order refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction, and, in the absence of statutory authority therefor, an appeal from such an order does not lie. We are therefore without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal, and the same is hereby. dismissed.

Dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1918: 21921: 11928: 119182026peak 1918 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Malone v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.9 S.W.2d 461 (Tex. App. 1928)
  2. Plateau Oil Co. v. Choate Oil Corporation235 S.W. 686 (Tex. App. 1921)
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Patterson204 S.W. 1026 (Tex. App. 1918)
  4. Rouser v. Wright205 S.W. 849 (Tex. App. 1918)

Most recent

  1. Malone v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.9 S.W.2d 461 (Tex. App. 1928)
  2. Plateau Oil Co. v. Choate Oil Corporation235 S.W. 686 (Tex. App. 1921)
  3. Rouser v. Wright205 S.W. 849 (Tex. App. 1918)
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Patterson204 S.W. 1026 (Tex. App. 1918)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list