TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ex Parte Black

Ex Parte J.H. Black.

Ex Parte Black, 113 S.W. 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 11, 1908
Docket
No. 4142.
Judges
Brooks
Citations
113 S.W. 53455 Tex. Crim. 1211908 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 490
Headnotes
Rape—Habeas Corpus—limitation—Consent—Age of Prosecutrix. Where upon habeas corpus it appeared on appeal that the act of carnal intercourse upon which the charge of rape was based occurred more than a year prior to the beginning of the prosecution, the offense was barred by limitation. Besides the evidence shows the consent of the prosecutrix who was 23 years of age at the time.
Summary
The opinion states the case.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Brooks

BROOKS, Judge.

Relator applied to the Hon. Lewis Fisher, Judge of the Tenth Judicial District of Texas, for a writ of habeas corpus, and upon hearing, was remanded to the custody of the sheriff on a charge in the justice court of rape.

It appears from the record that relator had previously had an examining trial on the 21st of September, 1908, before the justice of the peace of said county, and was remanded to custody in default of the giving of a $5,000 bond. Upon' a subsequent hearing the district judge fixed the bond at $2,000.

*122 The prosecuting witness swears that the first carnal intercourse took place in the month of May, 1907, more than a year prior to the beginning of the prosecution in this case. It follows, therefore, that the prosecution is barred by the statute of limitation. Furthermore, we do not think the evidence in this case shows the offense of rape, but on the contrary shows a clear consent on the part of the prosecutrix. We do not deem it necessary to collate the evidence. Suffice it to sa)r, the prosecutrix is 23

years of age, and the circumstances show that the illicit intercourse occurred in the kitchen with relator’s family sitting on the gallery, and the intercourse occurred under such circumstances that showed clear consent on the part of prosecutrix. Furthermore, she made no outcry, and manifested no concern about this supposed outrage upon her until a year or more afterwards.

The judgment is accordingly reversed, and relator ordered discharged.

Relator discharged.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 11993: 119772026peak 1977 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Yount853 S.W.2d 6 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) · Dissent
  2. Vasquez v. State557 S.W.2d 779 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977)

Most recent

  1. State v. Yount853 S.W.2d 6 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) · Dissent
  2. Vasquez v. State557 S.W.2d 779 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list