A. H. Andrews & Co. v. Curtis
A. H. Andrews & Co. v. John Curtis Et Al., Trustees
Headnotes
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Associate Justice.
This case went off on demurrer. Appellant, a corporation chartered in Illinois, sued the trustees of a school district in Clay County on a promissory note executed by their predecessors, under the school law of 1884, for school furniture for said district; alleging that the furniture was necessary, and that the school community continued to use it, etc., and praying in the alternative to recover on a quantum meruit.
We are of opinion that the law did not authorize the trustees to bind the school district in the manner alleged, and that appellant’s only remedy was to recover the furniture. We are confirmed in these views by the case cited by appellant from the Supreme Court of the State of its domicile, which decides both propositions squarely against it. Clark v. School District, 78 Ill., 474 .
The judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Delivered March 30, 1893.
A motion for rehearing was overruled.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 18 cases
View all citing references →- Federal District Courts1
- Historical Federal Courts1
- State Highest Courts8
- State Appellate Courts7
- State Trial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Carroll Independent School District v. Northwest Independent School District, Josh Wright, Mark Schluter, Steve Sprowls, Judy Copp, Ann Davis-Simpson, Lillian Rauch, and Ryder Warren, in Their Official Capacities Only
- Mason v. Pearson
- Wolfe v. Hammer
- Butler v. Parker
- Pfaff, Administratrix v. Clements
- Graybar Electric Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.