Dudley v. State
Oscar Dudley v. the State
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
*544 DAVIDSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to rape a girl under the age of 15
years, and-appeals. The charging part of the indictment is as follows: “Oscar Dudley * * * did then and there unlawfully in and upon Pearl Hyden, who was then and there a female under the age of fifteen years, make 'an assault, with the intent then and there to commit the offense of rape upon the said Pearl Hyden, by then and there attempting to have carnal knowledge of the said Pearl Hyden.” It is contended that this indictment .is fatally defective in failing to charge that the assaulted female was not the wife of the défendant. This identical question came before us in the case of Edwards v. State, ante p. 242, on motion for rehearing, at our recent Dallas term. It was there held that in cases of assault with intent to rape, the indictment must negative the fact that the girl was the wife of the accused. Eor proper form of indictment in this character of case, see White’s Ann. Penal Code, § 1101. Under the authority of Edwards v. State, and authorities there cited, the judgment in this case is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Reversed and Dismissed.
Hurt, Presiding Judge, absent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.