R. B. Godley Lumber Co. v. C. C. Slaughter Co.

1. Judgment 261(l) — Vendor’s Interest — Assignment. As vendor may pass his superior legal title to the holder of an unpaid purchase-money note, the assignee of the note and superior title may likewise pass such title to a subsequent assignee of the same unpaid note. 5. Vendor and Purchaser &wkey;3261(l) — Vendor’s Interest — Assignment. The fact that a transfer of a. purchase-money note and lien and vendor’s superior legal title occurs at different dates would not affect the transferee’s right to recover the land. 6. Judgment &wkey;>743(2) —• Res Judicata — Title to Land. Plaintiff in a suit to recover land is not precluded by a former judgment from asserting a subsequently acquired title. 7. Vendor and Purchaser i&wkey;299(l) — Limitations — Recovery- of Land. Vernon’s Sayles’ Ann. Civ. St. 1914, art. 5694, limiting right to recover land by vendor or his transferee to four years after maturity of the purchase-money note, applies to an action for the recovery of land by the owner of a purchase-money note and the vendor’s superior title.

Appeal from District Oourt, Smith County; J. R. Warren, Judge. Action by the C. C. Slaughter Company against the R. B. Godley Lumber Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Appellee company sued the appellant company and W. M. C. Hill, trustee in bankruptcy, on April 19, 1915, in trespass to- try title to certain described tracts of land. The petition further set up that the appellee was the owner and holder of a vendor’s lien note against the land, and that, if appellee be denied recovery of the land itself, then judgment for the debt be rendered with foreclosure of the lien on the land in accordance with the alternative prayer. The defendants answered with demurrer, statute of limitation in bar of suit, plea of not guilty, general denial, and a plea of res adju-dicata. The plea of res adjudicata is to the effect that cause of action No. 7236 in the district court of Smith county, Tex., styled O. C. Slaughter, Jr., v. R. B. Godley Lumber Company, was to try the title to the same land described in the present suit, and the judgment entered in the district court in favor of C. C. Slaughter, Jr., against R. B. Godley Lumber Company for the land was, on appeal to the Oourt of Civil Appeals of the Sixth District, reversed, and final judgment there entered denying to C.. C. Slaughter, Jr., a recovery of the land. By supplemental petition the appellee answered that in the suit No. 7236 set up by the appellant it was not the owner of the title now claimed in the present suit, but acquired the title now claimed after the final determination of the said suit. There was a trial before the court without a jury, and judgment was entered in favor of the ap-pellee for the land. On December 5, 1906, W. L. Noble conveyed by deed to R. B. Godley Lumber Company, a corporation, certain lands. The consideration was $11,329.30 payable to the' order of W. L. Noble on or before five years after the date, which was December 5, 1906, and bearing 5 per cent, interest annually. The deed as well as the face of the note expressly retained a vendor’s lien on the land to secure payment of the said purchase-money note. The president of the R., B. God-ley Lumber. Company was authorized by the directors to purchase the land and execute the note. On December 12, 1906, the R. B. Godley Lumber Company executed a deed of trust on the lands sued for to A. A. Slaughter, trustee, to secure O. C„ Slaughter in the payment of a note for $11,329.30 due five years after its date of December 12, 1906. The note was in evidence with the indorsement by C. C. Slaughter of: “Without recourse on us, either in law or equity, for value received, I 'hereby transfer the within note, with all liens on property connected with securing the payment thereof to C. C. Slaughter, Jr., or order. April 1st, 1913.” On September 29, 1908, W. L. Noble made a written transfer of the vendor’s note and also of the superior legal title to the land to the Kansas City Life Insurance Company, which was duly registered. On December 21, 1911, the Kansas City Life Insurance Company made written transfer of the note and lien to C. C. Slaughter,! which transfer was duly registered. On April 11, 1913, C. C. Slaughter in writing transferred th'e note and the lien to C. C. Slaughter, Jr., which transfer was duly registered. On January 2, 1915, the Kansas City Life Insurance Company executed a quitclaim deed to C. O. Slaughter, Jr., to the lands described in the deed from W. L. Noble to the R. B. Godley Lumber Company, which conveyance was duly registered. On April 15, 1915, C. C. Slaughter, Jr., executed a quitclaim deed to O. C. Slaughter Company to the lands in the deed from W. L. Noble to the R. B. Godley Lumber Company, which was duly registered on April 19, 1915. The C. C. Slaughter Company was the assignee of the vendor’s lien note from 0. 0. Slaughter, Jr. The purchase-money note has not been paid by the vendee. The defendant offered in evidence the original petition of the plaintiff in cause No. 7236 in the district court of Smith county, Tex., styled C. O. Slaughter, Jr., v. R. B. God-loy Lumber Company, which was filed in April, 1913. The suit was for the recovery of the amount due on the vendor’s lien note of December 5, 1906, and for the foreclosure of the lien, and also in the same suit to recover upon the other note for $11,329.30 secured by the deed of trust, and for foreclosure of the mortgage lien. Afterwards, on July 1, 1913, the plaintiff in that suit filed a first amended original petition and sued in trespass to try title to the land upon which the vendor’s lien was retained, and also tO' fix the alleged mortgage lien upon the land without foreclosure. The amended petition was prosecuted in the district court to final judgment therein, which was a recovery of the lands sued for and also fixing upon the lands the mortgage lien securing the second note for $11,329.30. The land in that suit is the same land as in the present suit. On appeal the said judgment of the district court was, on the 14th day of November, 1914, reversed, and a judgment rendered that O. O. Slaughter, Jr., take nothing by his suit as to the land, but affirming that portion of the judgment establishing the mortgage lien. The judgment of the court of appeals became final. The opinion of the court of appeals was offered in evidence as reported in 171 S. W. 779.