French v. State
J.S. French v. State.
French v. State, 153 S.W. 858 (Tex. Crim. App. 1913)
Headnotes
Stock Law—Recognizance—Appeal Bond.
Where, upon appeal from a conviction of the stock law, the record showed that appellant did not enter into a recognizance during term time, but after adjournment entered into an appeal bond, this court has no jurisdiction.
Summary
The opinion states the case.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
The term of court at which appellant was tried adjourned September 28, 1912. He did not enter into.a recognizance during term time, but after the adjournment of court undertook to perfect his appeal by entering into an appeal bond. This being a conviction for a misdemeanor, the appeal bond confers no jurisdiction on this court. Herron v. State, 27 Texas, 377 ; Jones v. State, 1 Texas Crim. App., 485; Arnold v. State, 3 Texas Crim. App., 437.
The ¡appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.