TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

First National Bank of Bridgeport v. Akin

First National Bank of Bridgeport v. W. J. Akin Et Al.

First Nat'l Bank of Bridgeport v. Akin, 206 S.W. 928 (Tex. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 2, 1918
Docket
No. 3076.
Judges
Phillips
Citations
206 S.W. 928109 Tex. 2971918 Tex. LEXIS 88
Headnotes
Case Followed—Married Woman’s Contract. The rulings in Red River National Bank v. Ferguson, ante, p. 287, are followed and held to control the disposition of this case. The Married Woman’s Act of 1913 does' not confer on her power to contract as surety for her husband on a note not given for necessaries, and she is not bound thereby. (P. 298.)
Summary
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District on writ of error from Wise County. The bank sued Akin and wife as joint makers of a promissory note executed December 3, 1914, and for foreclosure of a deed of trust given by both to secure it. Neither defendant answered and judgment was taken by default against both with foreclosure of the mortgage. Nellie P. Akin, the wife, brought the case to the Court of Civil Appeals on writ of error, asserting that she appeared on the face of the record to be a married woman, that there were no allegations charging her personally or her separate estate with liability or calling on her to plead her disability. The appellate court reformed the judgment, disallowing the recovery against her except for the foreclosure. (194 S. W., 610.) The bank thereupon procured writ of error from the Supreme Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Phillips

Mr. Chief Justice PHILLIPS delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is ruled by the decision in Red River National Bank v. Ferguson, the question presented being the same.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1924: 11927: 11931: 11936: 119242026peak 1924 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Guaranty State Bank v. Shirey258 S.W. 1109 (Tex. App. 1924)
  2. Currie v. Melton96 S.W.2d 806 (Tex. App. 1936)
  3. Graham v. Carmany2 S.W.2d 467 (Tex. App. 1927)
  4. Alexander Film Co. v. Ligon36 S.W.2d 313 (Tex. App. 1931)

Most recent

  1. Currie v. Melton96 S.W.2d 806 (Tex. App. 1936)
  2. Alexander Film Co. v. Ligon36 S.W.2d 313 (Tex. App. 1931)
  3. Graham v. Carmany2 S.W.2d 467 (Tex. App. 1927)
  4. Guaranty State Bank v. Shirey258 S.W. 1109 (Tex. App. 1924)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list