TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cowles v. M.K. T. Ry. Co.

mrs.C.C. Cowles v. Missouri, Kansas Texas Railway Company of Texas.

Cowles v. M.K. T. Ry. Co., 67 S.W. 1078 (Tex. 1902)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 3, 1902
Docket
No. 1133.
Judges
GAINES, CHIEF JUSTICE.
Citations
67 S.W. 107896 Tex. 241902 Tex. LEXIS 115

Opinion of the Court

In this case the Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause. We took jurisdiction of the case and granted the writ of error because of the allegation in the petition for the writ that the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals "practically settled the case," and because, as we thought, that allegation was true. Having examined the case upon its merits, and being of the opinion that the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals that "the evidence presents a clear case of contributory negligence" is correct, it becomes our duty to render judgment for the defendant in error.

There is no allegation in the petition to the effect that the servants of the railroad company discovered the peril of the deceased in time to have prevented the injury. The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals in so far as it reverses the judgment of the trial court is affirmed and judgment is here rendered for the defendant in error.

Affirmed and judgment rendered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1918: 21934: 119182026peak 1918 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Frick v. International & G. N. Ry. Co.207 S.W. 198 (Tex. App. 1918)
  2. Freeman v. Huffman206 S.W. 819 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1918)
  3. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Zarate74 S.W.2d 721 (Tex. App. 1934)

Most recent

  1. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Zarate74 S.W.2d 721 (Tex. App. 1934)
  2. Freeman v. Huffman206 S.W. 819 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1918)
  3. Frick v. International & G. N. Ry. Co.207 S.W. 198 (Tex. App. 1918)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list