Burgess v. Young County Abstract & Title Co.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
CONNER, C. J.
In December, 1910, appellant instituted this suit against the Young County Abstract &, Title Company, a co-partnership composed of George H. McLaren and R. L. Tankersly, to recover the sum of $150 alleged to have been paid by appellant to said company on account of the purchase price of a certain tract of land situated in Archer county. The said members of the abstract company presented in the justice’s court their plea of privilege to be sued in Young county, Tex., where it was alleged they resided. < Their plea was sustained in the justice’s court, and on appeal to the county court of Archer county a like judgment was rendered.
[1, 2]
We think the plea of privilege sufficiently met the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition, and in the absence of a statement of facts, and there is none, we are unable to say that the court erred in determining the plea of privilege in appellee’s favor. The court, however, .dismissed the suit, and in this we think there was error. The court should have transferred the case to the county court of Young county. See General Laws of Texas 1907, p. 248.
The judgment is accordingly reversed, and the cause remanded to the county court of Archer county, with instructions to transfer the case to the county court of Young county, Tex.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.