TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jones v. Wynne

J. B. Jones, Administrator v. G. A. Wynne.

Jones v. Wynne, 129 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. 1939)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 7, 1939
Docket
No. 7276.
Judges
Taylor
Citations
129 S.W.2d 286133 Tex. 448

Opinion of the Court — Taylor

Mr. Judge Taylor delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

*450 This suit originated in the probate court by the filing by G. A. Wynne of his application to sell 1920 acres in the Sea-bum A. Mills Survey in Walker County to pay his claim of $16,386.00 allowed by the administrator and approved by the probate court against the estate of Helen M. Jones, deceased, as a secured claim secured by a lien on the 1920 acres of land. The probate court granted the application ordering sale of the land February 16, 1934, as the property of the estate of Mrs. Jones, and the administrator, J. B. Jones, appealed to the district court. The transcript and original papers were filed in that court on March 13, 1934. The administrator filed a plea in abatement on the ground, among others not material here, that the certiorari proceedings in which the children of Helen M. Jones were seeking to review the action of the probate court in approving the above claim, had been filed, tried, and appeal perfected. That case was decided against their contentions by the district court and Court of Civil Appeals, and the judgments of those courts have today been upheld by this Court in an opinion in which it is held that the trial court had no jurisdiction to review by certiorari the probate court’s action in approving Wynne’s claim. Jones et al v. Wynne et al., (this volume p. 436), 129 S. W. (2d) 279 .

As pointed out by the Court of Civil Appeals, if its holding in the case cited is correct then the judgment of the trial court in the present case refusing to abate this cause, is likewise correct. Upon this holding it affirmed the trial court’s judgment. 104 S. W. (2d) 145 . The holding of the Court of Civil Appeals is. obviously correct, and its judgment affirming that of the trial court, is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court June 7, 1939.

Rehearing overruled July 5, 1939.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1939: 11954: 11955: 11957: 11968: 119392026peak 1939 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Clayton v. Clayton308 S.W.2d 557 (Tex. App. 1957)
  2. Dunaway v. Easter129 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. 1939)
  3. Richardson v. Lingo273 S.W.2d 119 (Tex. App. 1954)
  4. Usher v. Wendell430 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. App. 1968)
  5. Dodson v. Dodson277 S.W.2d 278 (Tex. App. 1955)

Most recent

  1. Usher v. Wendell430 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. App. 1968)
  2. Clayton v. Clayton308 S.W.2d 557 (Tex. App. 1957)
  3. Dodson v. Dodson277 S.W.2d 278 (Tex. App. 1955)
  4. Richardson v. Lingo273 S.W.2d 119 (Tex. App. 1954)
  5. Dunaway v. Easter129 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Jones v. Wynne, 129 S.W.2d 279 (Tex. 1939) 21
Jones v. Wynne, 104 S.W.2d 145 (Tex. App. 1937) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list