TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Carlyle Johnson v. Doyle Busby Donald Miller and Myron Gauger

Carlyle JOHNSON, Appellee-Appellant, v. Doyle BUSBY; Donald Miller and Myron Gauger, Appellants-Appellees

Carlyle Johnson v. Doyle Busby Donald Miller & Myron Gauger, 704 F.2d 419 (8th Cir. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 13, 1983
Docket
Nos. 82-1432, 82-1548
Judges
Lay, Bright, Ross
Citations
704 F.2d 4191983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28862

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Carlyle Johnson brought suit against Doyle Busby, Donald Miller, and Myron Gauger, employees of the Farmers Home Administration (FHA), alleging that these FHA officials willfully and maliciously denied him an FHA loan. A jury awarded Johnson the sum of one dollar in damages. The FHA officials appeal the award on grounds of immunity to liability for the common law tort claims against them. Johnson cross-appeals in denying Johnson’s motion for a new trial on damages.

The record in this case establishes without question that the defendants acted within the outer perimeter of their duties. As such, these officials possess an absolute immunity from damages based on common law torts.

Barr v. Matteo, 360 U.S. 564 , 79 S.Ct. 1335 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1434 (1959). This present case is controlled by this court’s decision in Gross v. Sederstrom, 429 F.2d 96 (8th Cir.1970), which presented a factual situation not legally distinguishable from the facts here. We therefore conclude that the district court erred in denying defendants’ several motions for dismissal before, during, and after trial, and in failing to grant defendants’ motion for judgment n.o.v.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions that the trial court enter a judgment of dismissal of Johnson’s actions against the defendants.

We reject the cross-appeal and affirm the trial court’s order denying Johnson a new trial on damages.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1986: 31987: 119862026peak 1986 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kenneth Poolman and Jeffrey Poolman v. Gerald Nelson802 F.2d 304 (8th Cir. 1986)
  2. Hagemeier v. Block806 F.2d 197 (8th Cir. 1986)
  3. Terry L. Arcoren v. Wenton Peters and John Schooler829 F.2d 671 (8th Cir. 1987)
  4. Henry H. Hagemeier, and Mary L. Hagemeier, His Wife v. John Block, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of the United States Dept. Of Agriculture Allen Brock, Individually and in His Capacity as Acting Assistant Administrator for Farmer Programs and Former Acting Administrator of the Farmers Home Administration, Charles Shuman, Individually and in His Capacity as Administrator of the Farmers Home Administration John O. Foster, Individually and in His Capacity as State Director of Missouri Rande S. Bryan, Individually and in His Capacity as District Director Terry A. Luetkemeyer, Individually and in His Capacity as County Supervisor, United States Department of Agriculture, Charles Rule, Jr806 F.2d 197 (8th Cir. 1986)

Most recent

  1. Terry L. Arcoren v. Wenton Peters and John Schooler829 F.2d 671 (8th Cir. 1987)
  2. Henry H. Hagemeier, and Mary L. Hagemeier, His Wife v. John Block, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of the United States Dept. Of Agriculture Allen Brock, Individually and in His Capacity as Acting Assistant Administrator for Farmer Programs and Former Acting Administrator of the Farmers Home Administration, Charles Shuman, Individually and in His Capacity as Administrator of the Farmers Home Administration John O. Foster, Individually and in His Capacity as State Director of Missouri Rande S. Bryan, Individually and in His Capacity as District Director Terry A. Luetkemeyer, Individually and in His Capacity as County Supervisor, United States Department of Agriculture, Charles Rule, Jr806 F.2d 197 (8th Cir. 1986)
  3. Hagemeier v. Block806 F.2d 197 (8th Cir. 1986)
  4. Kenneth Poolman and Jeffrey Poolman v. Gerald Nelson802 F.2d 304 (8th Cir. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Barr v. Matteo, 360 U.S. 564 (1959) 1,117
Gross v. Waldo Sederstrom, 429 F.2d 96 (8th Cir. 1970) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list