TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Koch v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.

Henry Koch v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Company

Koch v. Mo. Valley Bridge & Iron Co., 101 S.W. 872 (Tex. App. 1907)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Texas · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 10, 1907
Judges
Key, Hon, Hornsby
Citations
101 S.W. 87246 Tex. Civ. App. 841907 Tex. App. LEXIS 23
Cited by 8
Headnotes
Briefs,—Assignment not Copied. Where the assignments of error are not copied in appellant’s brief, they will not be considered, and the case will be affirmed in the absence of fundamental error.
Summary
Appeal from the County Court of Travis County.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Key

KEY, Associate Justice.

The transcript contains only two assignments of error, neither of which are copied in appellant’s brief, as required by Rule 29. On account of this violation of that rule appellee in its brief objects to appellant’s brief and to- consideration by this court of the grounds for reversal therein urged. Though appellee’s brief has been on file over three months, appellant has made no effort to remedy the defect in his brief. Therefore, we sustain appellee’s objection. (Chappell v. Missouri Pac. Ry., 75 Texas, 82 ; Harris v. Crabtree, 4 Texas Civ. App., 321; Horseman v. Coleman County, 57 S. W. Rep., 304 ; Bowman v. Hoffman, 74 S. W. Rep., 340 .)

We have discovered no fundamental error and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →
1916: 11919: 11926: 11930: 11931: 11939: 11944: 11975: 119162026peak 1916 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stafford Const. Co., Inc. v. Martin531 S.W.2d 667 (Tex. App. 1975)
  2. Flynn v. Pan American Hotel Co.183 S.W.2d 446 (Tex. 1944)
  3. Churchwell v. Pure Oil Pipe Line Co.289 S.W. 196 (Tex. App. 1926)
  4. Temple Lumber Co. v. McDaniel24 S.W.2d 518 (Tex. App. 1930)
  5. State v. City of Tulsa1931 OK 754, 5 P.2d 744
  6. Fort Worth Lloyds v. Johnson129 S.W.2d 1157 (Tex. App. 1939)

Most recent

  1. Stafford Const. Co., Inc. v. Martin531 S.W.2d 667 (Tex. App. 1975)
  2. Flynn v. Pan American Hotel Co.183 S.W.2d 446 (Tex. 1944)
  3. Fort Worth Lloyds v. Johnson129 S.W.2d 1157 (Tex. App. 1939)
  4. State v. City of Tulsa1931 OK 754, 5 P.2d 744
  5. Temple Lumber Co. v. McDaniel24 S.W.2d 518 (Tex. App. 1930)
  6. Churchwell v. Pure Oil Pipe Line Co.289 S.W. 196 (Tex. App. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Chappell v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 12 S.W. 977 (Tex. App. 1889) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list