Julius L. King and Joan King, Debtors. Julius L. King and Joan King, Debtors v. Joe M. Flournoy, Chapter 13 Trustee
In the Matter of Julius L. KING and Joan King, Debtors. Julius L. KING and Joan King, Debtors, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joe M. FLOURNOY, Chapter 13 Trustee, Defendant-Appellee
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The Kings, debtors, appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order in their case. The bankruptcy court, in a two-paragraph order, dismissed the debtors’ chapter 13 case. The debtors, in a chapter 13 plan, proposed to repay secured creditors to the extent of 100% of their claims and unsecured creditors to the extent of approximately 33% of theirs. In reviewing the plan, the bankruptcy court looked to only one factor, the percentage of unsecured debts that the debtors intended to repay. The bankruptcy court, believing the minimum allowable percentage to be 70%, found the proposed 33% too low.
We REVERSE and REMAND for consideration of the plan in light of all the factors discussed in our recent opinion in In Re: Charles E. Kitchens, et al., Bankrupts, 702 F.2d 885 (11th Cir.1983). For the repayment of unsecured debt under a chapter 13 plan, there is no fixed minimum percentage greater than zero.
See 11 U.S.C.A. sec. 1325 (a)(4) (1979).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.