Kerlin v. Bassett
Kerlin v. Bassett.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
HUPP, C. J.
Appellee files his motiom herein to dismiss this appeal on the ground: that this court has no jurisdiction, for the-reason that this is a forcible entry and de-tainer proceeding, originating in the justice-of the peace court for damages in a sum not. exceeding‘$100. Appellee brought his action, of forcible detainer before the justice of the-peace against appellant, and obtained judgment in that court. Appellant sought to appeal from the judgment so obtained to the-county court of Crosby county. That court dismissed his appeal because the appeal bond was not filed within five days after obtaining judgment, and from the judgment of dismissal in the county court appellant appeals to this court. The judgment in the justice of the peace court or in the county court did not award damages in any sum.
*527 We think the motion should be sustained and the cause dismissed because this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal (Revised Statutes 1911, art 3962; Yarbrough v. Jenkins, 3 Willson, Civ. Cas. Ct. App. § 464; Lane v. Jack, 61 S. W. 422 ; Stein v. Stely, 32 S. W. 861 ; Allen v. Hall, 25 Tex. Civ. App. 178 , 60 S. W. 586 ), and it is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.