TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kerlin v. Bassett

Kerlin v. Bassett.

Kerlin v. Bassett, 152 S.W. 526 (Tex. App. 1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Texas · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 7, 1912
Judges
Hupp
Citations
152 S.W. 5261912 Tex. App. LEXIS 1245
Disposition
Dismissed.
Headnotes
FORCIBLE Entry and Detainer (§ 43*) — Review— Jurisdiction — Court oe Civil Appeals. . Under Rev. Civ. St. 1911, art. 3962, providing that, when an action of forcible entry and detainer is appealed to and tried by the-county court, the judgment of that court shall be conclusive, unless the damages recovered exceed $100, an appeal in such an action will not: lie from a county court judgment dismissing an appeal from a justice’s judgment allowing no-damages. [Ed. Note. — Por other cases, see Forcible Entry and Detainer, Cent. Dig. §§ 169-182: Dec-Dig. § 43.*]
Summary
Appeal from Crosby. County Court; Pink.L. Parish, Judge. Action by Julian Bassett against J. R'.. Kerlin. Prom a judgment dismissing defendant’s appeal to the county court, he appeals;.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hupp

HUPP, C. J.

Appellee files his motiom herein to dismiss this appeal on the ground: that this court has no jurisdiction, for the-reason that this is a forcible entry and de-tainer proceeding, originating in the justice-of the peace court for damages in a sum not. exceeding‘$100. Appellee brought his action, of forcible detainer before the justice of the-peace against appellant, and obtained judgment in that court. Appellant sought to appeal from the judgment so obtained to the-county court of Crosby county. That court dismissed his appeal because the appeal bond was not filed within five days after obtaining judgment, and from the judgment of dismissal in the county court appellant appeals to this court. The judgment in the justice of the peace court or in the county court did not award damages in any sum.

*527 We think the motion should be sustained and the cause dismissed because this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal (Revised Statutes 1911, art 3962; Yarbrough v. Jenkins, 3 Willson, Civ. Cas. Ct. App. § 464; Lane v. Jack, 61 S. W. 422 ; Stein v. Stely, 32 S. W. 861 ; Allen v. Hall, 25 Tex. Civ. App. 178 , 60 S. W. 586 ), and it is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1915: 11928: 11951: 11976: 119152026peak 1915 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Meyer v. Young545 S.W.2d 37 (Tex. App. 1976)
  2. Keils v. Waldron240 S.W.2d 788 (Tex. App. 1951)
  3. Delgado v. Chapa173 S.W. 1169 (Tex. App. 1915)
  4. Beacon Lumber Co. v. Brown4 S.W.2d 992 (Tex. App. 1928)

Most recent

  1. Meyer v. Young545 S.W.2d 37 (Tex. App. 1976)
  2. Keils v. Waldron240 S.W.2d 788 (Tex. App. 1951)
  3. Beacon Lumber Co. v. Brown4 S.W.2d 992 (Tex. App. 1928)
  4. Delgado v. Chapa173 S.W. 1169 (Tex. App. 1915)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Allen v. Hall, 60 S.W. 586 (Tex. App. 1901) 2
Lane v. Jack, 61 S.W. 422 (Tex. App. 1901) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list