TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mince v. State

Malcolm Mince v. the State

Mince v. State, 216 S.W. 869 (Tex. Crim. App. 1919)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 3, 1919
Docket
No. 5519.
Judges
Lattimore
Citations
216 S.W. 86986 Tex. Crim. 3271919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 421
Headnotes
Juvenile Court—Practice in Juvenile Court—Trial by Jury—Felony. Under, the statutes a charge against one of being a delinquent child is not a felony and the jury can be waived. Following: Lee v. State, recently decided.
Summary
The opinion states the case.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Lattimore

LATTIMORE, Judge.

—Appellant appeals from a conviction in the District Court of Hale County, sitting as a Juvenile Court and rendering a judgment finding appellant guilty of being a delinquent child, and ordering him confined in the State Industrial School for Boys, at Gatesville. The judgment recites that a jury was waived, and appellant found guilty of being a delinquent child.

A motion for a new trial was made and overruled, and the case, as brought here, presents but one point, to wit: that the complaint filed against appellant shows him to be guilty of a felony, and that in a felony case a jury cannot be waived. Under our statutes, a charge against one of being a delinquent child, is not a felony, and a jury can be waived. This identical question was before this Court in the companion ease of Allen Lee v. The State, decided at a former day of this term adversely to the contention of appellant.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed^

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1946: 119462026peak 1946 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cloud v. Market Street Railway Co.168 P.2d 191 (Cal. Ct. App. 1946)

Most recent

  1. Cloud v. Market Street Railway Co.168 P.2d 191 (Cal. Ct. App. 1946)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list