TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Scurry v. Friberg

Edgar Scurry v. J. F. Friberg Et Al.

Scurry v. Friberg, 32 S.W.2d 637 (Tex. 1930)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 26, 1930
Docket
No. Application No. 17820.
Judges
PER CURIAM:
Citations
32 S.W.2d 637119 Tex. 463

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam :

This suit is pending before us on application for writ of error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District. The application shows that the case is an original suit filed in the Court of Civil Appeals, asking that court for a writ of mandamus against the plaintiffs in error, who were members of the Democratic Executive Committee of Wichita County, to require them to place the names of certain parties on the primary ballot as candidates for nomination to office at such primary. Upon hearing of the application and answer, the Court of Civil Appeals directed the issuance of the writ of mandamus. This application for writ of error is made by the plaintiffs in error because of that action by the Court of Civil Appeals.

The law is well settled that this Court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of this suit. The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction to review decisions of the Courts of Civil Appeals only in cases where the latter exercise appellate jurisdiction. It has none to grant a writ of error where a Court of Civil Appeals in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, as in this case, has issued a writ of mandamus. The judgment of a Court of Civil Appeals in original actions of this character is final, in so far as the appellate jurisdiction of this Court is concerned. Schintz v. Morris, 89 Texas, 648 ; City of Houston v. City of Palestine, 114 Texas, 306 . The petition for writ of error is accordingly dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 11939: 11956: 21972: 11985: 119362026peak 1956 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jacolos v. State692 S.W.2d 724 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985)
  2. Woodruff v. Woodruff487 S.W.2d 692 (Tex. 1972)
  3. City of West University Place v. Martin123 S.W.2d 638 (Tex. 1939)
  4. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956)
  5. St. Louis, Southwestern Railway Co. v. Mauney93 S.W.2d 377 (Tex. 1936)
  6. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956)

Most recent

  1. Jacolos v. State692 S.W.2d 724 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985)
  2. Woodruff v. Woodruff487 S.W.2d 692 (Tex. 1972)
  3. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956)
  4. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956)
  5. City of West University Place v. Martin123 S.W.2d 638 (Tex. 1939)
  6. St. Louis, Southwestern Railway Co. v. Mauney93 S.W.2d 377 (Tex. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
City of Houston v. City of Palestine, 267 S.W. 663 (Tex. 1924) 39
Schintz v. Morris, 35 S.W. 1041 (Tex. 1896) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list