Holloway v. State
J. F. Holloway v. the State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge. — Conviction for a misdemeanor, punishment being assessed at confinement in jail for one year.
The complaint and information embrace averments sufficient to show that the sale of intoxicating liquor had been prohibited in Taylor County. It is further alleged that on or about the 15th day of September, 1936, in said Taylor County, appellant possessed whisky for the purpose of sale.
No statement of facts, is brought forward.
Appellant’s motion for new trial, wherein he alleges that the jury were guilty of misconduct, is not sworn to. Where the ground alleged is misconduct of the jury the motion for new trial must be sworn to. Parroccini v. State, 234 S. W., 671 ; White v. State, 94 S. W. (2d) 167 .
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.