TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thomas v. State

T. Thomas v. the State

Thomas v. State, 219 S.W. 1100 (Tex. Crim. App. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 24, 1920
Docket
No. 5730.
Judges
Davidson
Citations
219 S.W. 110087 Tex. Crim. 1531920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 144
Headnotes
Rape—Suspended Sentence—Practice on Appeal. Where, upon appeal from a conviction of rape, the record showed that the trial court entered judgment upon the verdict suspending sentence, and the verdict transcribed in the judgment failed to show any finding of the jury upon the question of suspended sentence, and did not contain the final sentence, the appeal must be dismissed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Davidson

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of rape and given six years in the penitentiary.

*154 The record before us contains the verdict of the jury alloting appellant six years in the penitentiary. The court enters a judgment upon the verdict and in addition suspends the sentence of the defendant, stating in the judgment that it was upon the recommendation of the jury. The verdict as transcribed in the judgment fails to show any finding of the jury upon the question of suspended sentence. It is not mentioned either for or against appellant in their finding on this question. If the verdict is incorrectly transcribed and the jury did find in favor of appellant on the suspended sentence, we might correct this judgment and make the matters conform to each other and with the law as prescribed by the statute. There would be no right of appeal from a conviction if suspended sentence was awarded, because of the want of a final judgment, which is the sentence pronounced by the court upon the verdict, but the record does not contain the sentence. So from either view point this court cannot entertain jurisdiction of the appeal. If a suspended sentence is legally awarded, an appeal cannot be prosecuted.' If this was not the case, then the appeal must be dismissed because there is no sentence contained in the record.

The appeal, therefore, will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1920: 11921: 21924: 11931: 11937: 11940: 11942: 11951: 11987: 119202026peak 1921 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ex Parte Renier734 S.W.2d 349 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987)
  2. Millican v. State167 S.W.2d 188 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)
  3. Lamkin v. State136 S.W.2d 225 (Tex. Crim. App. 1940)
  4. Gibson v. State257 S.W. 1101 (Tex. Crim. App. 1924)
  5. Fitch v. State235 S.W.2d 896 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)
  6. Arbuckle v. State105 S.W.2d 219 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)

Most recent

  1. Ex Parte Renier734 S.W.2d 349 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987)
  2. Fitch v. State235 S.W.2d 896 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)
  3. Millican v. State167 S.W.2d 188 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)
  4. Lamkin v. State136 S.W.2d 225 (Tex. Crim. App. 1940)
  5. Arbuckle v. State105 S.W.2d 219 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)
  6. State v. Liliopoulos5 P.2d 319 (Wash. 1931)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list