TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Spell v. Virginia Spell Green

J. R. Spell v. Virginia Spell Green Et Vir.

Spell v. Va. Spell Green, 192 S.W.2d 260 (Tex. 1946)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 13, 1946
Docket
No. A-798
Judges
PER CURIAM:
Citations
192 S.W.2d 260144 Tex. 5351946 Tex. LEXIS 111

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The appeal in this case is from a final judgment disposing of the cause of action on its merits, and therefore this Court has jurisdiction on the application for writ of error.

We approve the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals wherein it held that where the right to the custody of a minor child had been awarded in a divorce decree and a subsequent suit was brought to relitigate the right to the custody of the child on the ground of alleged change of conditions, the venue of the suit was in the county of the residence of the defendant. The application for writ of error is refused.

Opinion delivered February 13, 1946.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 29 cases

View all citing references →
1946: 11947: 11948: 21950: 11952: 11953: 31957: 21959: 11961: 11963: 11964: 11966: 21969: 41970: 31971: 11972: 21974: 11980: 119462026peak 1969 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Calbeck v. Bowen475 S.W.2d 607 (Tex. App. 1971)
  2. Quick v. Lindsay208 S.W.2d 910 (Tex. App. 1948)
  3. Boney v. Boney458 S.W.2d 907 (Tex. 1970)
  4. Yeagle v. Bull235 S.W.2d 226 (Tex. App. 1950)
  5. Huffman v. Huffman408 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. App. 1966)
  6. Steele v. Steele251 S.W.2d 258 (Tex. App. 1952)

Most recent

  1. Stephens v. Commissioner1980 T.C. Memo. 131
  2. Casey v. Jones509 S.W.2d 396 (Tex. App. 1974)
  3. Box v. Fleming484 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. App. 1972)
  4. Rose v. State482 S.W.2d 703 (Tex. App. 1972) · Dissent
  5. Calbeck v. Bowen475 S.W.2d 607 (Tex. App. 1971)
  6. Boney v. Boney458 S.W.2d 907 (Tex. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list