TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Miller v. Stine

Estell Miller v. Honorable Vincent Stine, District Judge.

Miller v. Stine, 91 S.W.2d 315 (Tex. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 26, 1936
Docket
No. 6520.
Judges
German
Citations
91 S.W.2d 315127 Tex. 221936 Tex. LEXIS 270

Opinion of the Court — German

Mr. Judge GERMAN delivered the opinion for the court. This is an original mandamus proceeding brought by Estell Miller, a feme sole, against Honorable Vincent Stine, Judge of the District Court of the 97th Judicial District of Texas.- The purpose of the suit is to compel the respondent to enter judgment in favor of relator in the case of Estell Miller v. R. L. McClure tried in the District Court of Montague County on April 13, 1933.

On careful inspection of the record we find that R. L. McClure, defendant in the cause mentioned, has not been a party to this proceeding, and has filed no answer herein. He being a necessary party, the order allowing filing of the petition was improvidently entered. Williams v. Wray, 123 Texas, 466 , 72 S. W. (2d) 577 , and authorities cited.

Since the filing of the petition in this case the Supreme Court has again taken occasion to specifically declare that in all cases where the Court of Civil Appeals has power to issue writs of mandamus, this court will not permit the filing of petitions for such writs. Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. Watkins et al., 126 Texas, 116 , 86 S. W. (2d) 1081 .

The petition for mandamus is therefore dismissed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court Febrary 26, 1936.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1938: 11942: 21950: 11956: 219382026peak 1942 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956) · Dissent
  2. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. Belcher163 S.W.2d 183 (Tex. 1942)
  3. McClure v. Miller116 S.W.2d 470 (Tex. App. 1938)
  4. Dexter v. Crosslin230 S.W.2d 383 (Tex. App. 1950)
  5. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956)
  6. Ridley v. McCallum Dist. Judge163 S.W.2d 833 (Tex. 1942)

Most recent

  1. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956)
  2. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956) · Dissent
  3. Dexter v. Crosslin230 S.W.2d 383 (Tex. App. 1950)
  4. Ridley v. McCallum Dist. Judge163 S.W.2d 833 (Tex. 1942)
  5. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. Belcher163 S.W.2d 183 (Tex. 1942)
  6. McClure v. Miller116 S.W.2d 470 (Tex. App. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. Watkins, 86 S.W.2d 1081 (Tex. 1935) 22
Williams v. Wray, 72 S.W.2d 577 (Tex. 1934) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list