Jeffrey M. Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Jeffrey M. PAULL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CREDIT CORPORATION, and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff-appellant, Jeffrey M. Pauli, brought this action on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, alleging that defendants-appellees, Chrysler Credit Corporation and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., violated the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1631 and 1638, and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, by failing to properly disclose certain items in a retail installment contract Pauli signed in connection with his purchase of an automobile from Fireside. The district court granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in a well considered memorandum opinion and order, reported at 544 F.Supp. 848 (N.D.Ill.E.D.1982). We are persuaded that the district court’s judgment is correct. We adopt Judge Aspen’s opinion and affirm the order and entry of judgment granting the motions for summary judgment.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.