United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Levino MICHELENA-OROVIO, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
On Rehearing
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
(Opinion March 25, 1983, 5 Cir., 1982, 702 F.2d 496 )
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, WISDOM, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POL-ITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGIN-BOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
706 F.2d 502
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Levino MICHELENA-OROVIO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 81-3706.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 18, 1983.
Dymond, Crull & Castaing, Edward J. Castaing, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant.
John Volz, U.S. Atty., Marilyn Barnes, Michael Schatzow, Asst. U.S. Attys., New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Frederick J.R. Heebe, Chief Judge.
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
(Opinion March 25, 1983, 5 Cir., 1982, 702 F.2d 496 )
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, WISDOM, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
1
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, 2
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.