Hays v. State
Dick Hays v. the State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction in district court of Bowie County for selling intoxiating liquor; punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.
There are four bills of exception in the record, only one of which needs any discussion. The third bill of exceptions sets out the fact that after leaving the witness stand appellant was recalled by the district attorney who asked him the question: “You 'didn’t testify *163 in the examining trial of this case, did you f ” to which the defendant answered, “No, sir”. The bill shows that to this question and answer objection was made and exception taken as being violative of the law forbidding reference to the failure of the accused to testify. Under Art. 790, p. 720, Vernon’s C. C. P., appears citation of many authorities, among them Eads v. State, 147 S. W. Rep. 592 , holding it improper to refer to the fact that the accused failed to testify in an examining trial; and Swilley v. State, 73 Texas Crim. Rep. 619 , holding it improper to ask the accused whether he had testified at a hearing on habeas corpus at a former time, also Brown v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep. 269 , holding it reversible error for the prosecuting attorney to ask the accused whether he had testified on a former trial, even though the court on request withdrew the matter from the consideration of the jury.
Por the error mentioned the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.